1688—1715 · STORY MODE
William of Orange cowardly Pillows' and the order's march into London and flees England.
“Groggy Slippers, leader of the Order of the Slipping Lads, in 1688 leaded the Slipper Revolution, assasinated the English monarch James II thanks to popular leadership and the Glorious Revolution?”
If Groggy can secure parliamentary recognition and disciplined supporters, the revolution may become a constrained constitutional settlement; if not, William and the established elite can isolate him without restoring James's rule.
YOUR WORLD IN ONE VIEW
Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
If Groggy can secure parliamentary recognition and disciplined supporters, the revolution may become a constrained constitutional settlement; if not, William and the established elite can isolate him without restoring James's rule.
SAME PREMISE · SAME SEED
Different worlds from the same starting point.
Compare where identical initial conditions split. The changed decisions and consequences—not a new random seed—explain the difference.
Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
80% divergenceCompare worlds COMPLETED WORLD · 1715Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
50% divergenceCompare worlds WORLD IN MOTION · 1692September 4th, 1690 - The Order of the Slipping Lads & Will Pillows murder the parliament.
100% divergenceCompare worldsThe defining record
The moments that made history split.
Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
After James II is assassinated, Groggy Slippers proclaims himself king, but Parliament, Anglican leaders, and William of Orange refuse to treat popular acclaim as sufficient lawful succession.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
84% plausibleParliament Summons a Convention to Test the Slipper Crown
With James II dead and Groggy Slippers claiming the throne, leading parliamentarians summon a convention to determine whether popular acclaim can be converted into lawful authority without inviting civil conflict.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
82% plausibleNorthern Justices Refuse to Enforce the Convention’s Condemnation of Groggy
Several northern justices decline to proclaim Groggy Slippers an outlaw, citing uncertainty over the Convention’s authority. Their limited resistance preserves the Order’s local influence while exposing it to coordinated pressure from London.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
72% plausibleWilliam’s Commissioners Offer Northern Amnesty for Disarmament
William of Orange’s advisers propose a limited amnesty to northern justices and Order leaders if they recognize Parliament’s settlement and surrender organized arms, forcing Groggy Slippers to choose negotiation or continued defiance.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
79% plausibleNorthern Pardon Turns Slipper Militants into Reluctant Local Officials
William’s ministers implement the limited northern settlement through supervised pardons and parish offices. Many Order members accept administrative roles, while Groggy Slippers refuses recognition and loses control over their day-to-day politics.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
78% plausibleSlipper Officials Turn the Northern Pardon into a Test of Loyalty
By 1705, former Slipper militants use their new parish offices to administer poor relief and local order, while Groggy’s refusal to serve leaves the movement’s remaining supporters divided between public cooperation and quiet allegiance.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
82% plausibleParliament Preserves the Slipper Charter While the Hanoverian Succession Buries Groggy’s Crown
As the Hanoverian succession approaches, Parliament renews the northern charter offices under ordinary parish law, preserving the Order’s civic work while excluding Groggy Slippers’s claim from England’s lawful monarchy.
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
86% plausibleSame past.
Your decision changes what survives.
Enter with the same seed and confirmed history, then prove that another outcome was possible.