PUBLIC TIMELINE / SIMULATIONGuest creator · seed 482719
1688—1715 · STORY MODE
The Crown Revolt - July 3rd, 1694 - The north Groggy supports invade the parliament.
“Groggy Slippers, leader of the Order of the Slipping Lads, in 1688 leaded the Slipper Revolution, assasinated the English monarch James II thanks to popular leadership and the Glorious Revolution?”
OUTCOME / 1715
If Groggy can secure parliamentary recognition and disciplined supporters, the revolution may become a constrained constitutional settlement; if not, William and the established elite can isolate him without restoring James's rule.
E / ELSEWHEN SPECULATIVE SIMULATION
DIVERGENCE80%New world trajectory
DEFINING DECISIONS3Choices permanently recorded
STATE HASH517eafceReproducible record
BRANCHES13 comparable runs
YOUR WORLD IN ONE VIEW
Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
If Groggy can secure parliamentary recognition and disciplined supporters, the revolution may become a constrained constitutional settlement; if not, William and the established elite can isolate him without restoring James's rule.
SAME PREMISE · SAME SEED
Different worlds from the same starting point.
Compare where identical initial conditions split. The changed decisions and consequences—not a new random seed—explain the difference.
COMPLETED WORLD · 1715
Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
50% divergenceCompare worlds COMPLETED WORLD · 1715Slippers Claim the Crown as Parliament Challenges the New King
100% divergenceCompare worlds WORLD IN MOTION · 1692September 4th, 1690 - The Order of the Slipping Lads & Will Pillows murder the parliament.
100% divergenceCompare worlds1688 / ORIGIN1715 / ELSEWHEN
prosperity39+0.5
approval69+1.0
stability45+2.2
education290.0
trade410.0
risk57-1.9
The defining record
The moments that made history split.
1692
01 · INSTITUTIONS
Parliament Summons a Convention to Test the Slipper Crown
With James II dead and Groggy Slippers claiming the throne, leading parliamentarians summon a convention to determine whether popular acclaim can be converted into lawful authority without inviting civil conflict.
approval · An early shiftPublic trust grewprosperity · An early shiftDaily life became more prosperousrisk · A visible changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeThe political order lost its footing
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
82% plausible1697
02 · POLITICS
Northern Justices Refuse to Enforce the Convention’s Condemnation of Groggy
Several northern justices decline to proclaim Groggy Slippers an outlaw, citing uncertainty over the Convention’s authority. Their limited resistance preserves the Order’s local influence while exposing it to coordinated pressure from London.
approval · A visible changePublic trust grewprosperity · An early shiftDaily life became more prosperousrisk · A visible changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeThe political order lost its footing
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
72% plausible1699
03 · INSTITUTIONS
Northern Justices Split Over a Conditional Oath to William
William’s ministers ask northern justices to enforce a conditional oath of obedience while leaving Groggy Slippers’s fate unsettled. Local magistrates divide, forcing the Order to choose between accommodation and open defiance.
approval · A visible changePublic trust grewprosperity · A visible changeDaily life became more prosperousrisk · A visible changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeThe political order lost its footing
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
79% plausible1706
04 · INSTITUTIONS
Northern Parishes Turn the Slipper Oath into a Local Compact
In 1705, parish officers and moderate members of the Order draft a common form of obedience to William while preserving a ceremonial popular claim, forcing Groggy Slippers to choose between disciplined legality and renewed confrontation.
approval · An early shiftPublic trust grewrisk · A visible changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeInstitutions gained control
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
78% plausible1708
05 · POLITICS
Northern Magistrates Withdraw the Slipper Compact After Groggy’s Ultimatum
Groggy Slippers’s demand for royal and parliamentary recognition convinces northern magistrates that the local compact cannot contain the movement. They suspend its ceremonial clauses, while moderate parish officers preserve ordinary obedience to William.
approval · A visible changePublic trust grewprosperity · An early shiftEconomic pressure reached ordinary householdsrisk · A decisive changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeThe political order lost its footing
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
86% plausible1710
06 · INSTITUTIONS
Northern Parishes Convert the Slipper Network into Ordinary Loyalty
After magistrates withdraw the ceremonial compact, parish officers preserve order by requiring standard obedience to William. Moderate Slipping Lads accept the arrangement, while Groggy’s remaining royal claim loses local machinery.
approval · An early shiftPublic trust grewprosperity · An early shiftEconomic pressure reached ordinary householdsrisk · A visible changeViolence became more likelystability · A visible changeThe political order lost its footing
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
82% plausible1715
07 · INSTITUTIONS
The Slipping Lads Abandon the Crown to Preserve Their Brotherhood
In 1715, Groggy Slippers and moderate northern organizers formally confine the Order to mutual aid and lawful meetings, preserving its social network while ending its practical claim to England’s crown.
approval · An early shiftPublic trust grewculturalReach · An early shiftThe idea captured a wider audienceprosperity · An early shiftDaily life became more prosperousrisk · A visible changeThe threat of conflict recededstability · A visible changeInstitutions gained control
WHAT REMAINS UNRESOLVED
Popular kingship versus parliamentary legitimacy
91% plausibleSame past.
Your decision changes what survives.
Enter with the same seed and confirmed history, then prove that another outcome was possible.